What is your approach for balancing the preservation of a building’s historic significance with a client’s desire for a modern, functional home?
For me it always starts with understanding the building’s significance. Before making any design decisions, I take time to identify what gives the building its special interest, whether that’s historic fabric, key architectural features, craftsmanship, or its spatial arrangement. Guidance from organisations like Historic England reinforces the importance of assessing significance first and then designing around it. At the same time, I work with the client to understand how they want to live. A historic home still needs to function for contemporary life, whether that means improved layouts, more natural light, upgraded services, or better connections between spaces. My role is to find solutions that respect the building while meeting those needs.
In practice, I prioritise retaining and repairing original fabric wherever possible, because once it’s lost, it can’t truly be replaced. When new interventions are required, I work with the design team to make sure they are sympathetic in scale, proportion, and material. That doesn’t negate contemporary design, as the old and new can create a stronger architectural approach, which helps to show the evolution of the building. Often a much more successful approach than opting for the pastiche.
I also try to focus more substantial changes in areas of lesser significance and wherever possible, design interventions can be reversible, so future generations have options. Ultimately, I see it as a collaborative and carefully balanced process. With thoughtful design, it’s entirely possible to create a modern, functional home that still celebrates and preserves its historic character.